Skip to content
Back to blog

The 90-Day Standard: How to Hold AI Vendors Accountable to Outcomes

2026-07-09·2 min read
The 90-Day Standard: How to Hold AI Vendors Accountable to Outcomes

If a vendor cannot show you a measurable result in 90 days, ask why. Then ask it again.

Read more

Why 90 days works

Eighteen months is long enough that the people who approved the investment have often moved on before results are due. Short enough to keep the renewal conversation alive before the full picture is clear.

Ninety days is not an arbitrary benchmark. It is the minimum period in which a properly structured AI deployment — governed data, defined use case, clear outcome — should demonstrate measurable progress.

The questions that change the conversation

Start here instead: "What specific, measurable outcome will this engagement deliver in 90 days?"

What the answers tell you

"Our standard implementation is 12-18 months." This is a commercial structure, not a technical constraint.

Building the accountability structure

Define the outcome in the contract, not the proposal. Establish the baseline in the first two weeks. Define the consequence of underperformance. Run a 45-day check-in.

The KPIs that matter

Track metrics that appear on a balance sheet or P&L: margin recovery, working capital improvement, forecast accuracy, close cycle compression, reconciliation cost.

Aevah is built on the 90-day outcome standard. Governed data, defined result, no rip-and-replace.

Start the 90-day pilot →

[Forward this to whoever is reviewing your next AI vendor proposal.]

Up next

What Happens to the Finance Function When AI Actually Works

CFO

What Happens to the Finance Function When AI Actually Works

Ready to act on this?

Turn this insight into a 90-day plan.

If this resonates, the next step is simple — start a scoped First Flight or book a direct executive conversation.

Start First FlightSchedule Executive Briefing